Current library | Call number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lyon : MOM - Bibliothèque de la Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée Libre accès | EGY DT43. SUI.OBOsa 27 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 105537 | ||
Nanterre : MSH Mondes - Bibliothèque d’archéologie et des sciences de l’Antiquité | D.300/783 BENT (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | P10 ERA ViOr 2008-02-07 4649/5092 | BMRG12448 |
Browsing Lyon : MOM - Bibliothèque de la Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée shelves, Shelving location: Libre accès Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | |||||||
EGY DT43. SUI.OBO 269 Skarabäen des 1. Jahrtausends , Ein Workshop in Münster am 27. Oktober 2012 | EGY DT43. SUI.OBO 60 Formen für ägyptische Fayencen Katalog der Sammlung des biblischen Instituts der Universität Freiburg Schweiz und einer Privatsammlung | EGY DT43. SUI.OBOsa 2 Essai de classification et datation des scarabées Menkhéperrê | EGY DT43. SUI.OBOsa 27 Scarabs, chronology and interconnections , Egypt and Palestine in the second intermediate period | EGY DT43. USA.EEMM 11 The Tomb of Rekh-mi-Rê at Thebes , Two volumes in one | EGY DT43. USA.EEMM 13&14 the Temple of Hibis in el Khargeh oasis The excavations Greek inscriptions | EGY DT43. USA.EEMM 29 The pyramid complex of Amenemhat I at Lisht , the architecture |
Bibliogr. p. 195-208. Notes bibliogr. Index
The present study deals with relations between Egypt and the Levant during the Second Intermediate Period, based primarily on contemporary scarabs from both regions. The potential contribution of scarabs for the historical reconstruction of the Second Intermediate Period, especially with regard to Egyptian/Levantine relations, has long been recognized. Yet the controversy over scarab typologies ruled out the scarabs as a reliable historical source. This study proposes a new typology of scarabs in the first half of the second millennium BCE, which is now feasible owing to recent studies of ceramic assemblages from Egypt and the Levant. Based on these studies, one can determine the relative and absolute dates of deposits in which scarabs and scarab impressions have been found in both regions and substantiate the correspondence of the Second Intermediate Period in Egypt with Middle Bronze Age IIB in the Levant.
The principal methodological difference between the present study and previous scarab studies is its treatment of the Egyptian and Palestinian series as two separate groups. The geographical classification of the large corpus of scarabs, which previously had been dealt with as one entity, allowed for a systematic differentiation between Egyptian and Canaanite scarabs of this period and the establishment of separate stylistic and chronological typologies for each group. The historical conclusions presented in this study confirm the significance of scarabs as a primary source of information for reconstructing the history of the Second Intermediate Period in the Egypt and the Levant.
There are no comments on this title.