site du réseau Frantiq
Image from Google Jackets
Normal view MARC view
Alexander the Great and the East : History, Art, Tradition / edited by Krzysztof Nawotka and Agnieszka Wojciechowska
Ouvrage
Appartient aux collections: Philippika, Hengstl, Joachim, Wiesbaden, 2004-, 103, 1613-5628
Publication: Wiesbaden : Harrassowitz, 2016 Description: 1 vol. (447p.) ; 25 cmCollection : Philippika; 103, ISSN 1613-5628Titre de forme: Congrès, Varsovie, 2013ISBN: 9783447107105.Langue: AnglaisPays: Allemagne Auteur principal: Nawotka, Krzysztof Dariusz, Editeur scientifique, 1960-.... Co-auteur: Bron-Wojciechowska, Agnieszka, Editeur scientifique Résumé: Even if Alexander’s rule in Asia has to be approached primarily through the study of Greek and Latin authors, many papers in this volume try to look beyond Arrian, Plutarch, Curtius, and Diodorus to Greek inscriptions, papyri, Egyptian, Babylonian, medieval Syriac and Arabic evidence. One focus is on Egypt, from the XXX dynasty to the Ptolemaic age. A lasting achievement of the early Macedonian age in Egypt is the lighthouse of Pharos, probably devised under Alexander to serve both as a watchtower of Alexandria and the focal point of the fire telegraph. Another focus of the volume is on Babylonia, with caveats against the over-enthusiastic usage of cuneiform sources for Alexander. This focus then moves further east, showing how much caution is necessary in studying the topography of Alexander’s campaigns in Baktria, the land often misrepresented by ancient and medieval authors. It also deals with representation and literary topoi, having in mind that Alexander was as much a historical as a literary figure. In many respects ancient Alexander historians handled his persona in strong connection with Herodotean topics, while the idealized portrait of Alexander translated, through court poetry, into the language of power of Ptolemy of Egypt. Alexander was adopted to cultural traditions of the East, both through the medium of the Alexander Romance and through his fictitious correspondence with Aristotle, sometimes becoming a figure of a (Muslim) mystic or a chosen (Jewish) king. (Source : éditeur).Mots libres: Memnon de Rhodes -- Belephantes -- Branchides -- Posidippe -- Troisième Reich -- Île de Pharos -- Marakanda -- cour royale -- miroir des princes -- cosmopolitisme . Item type: Ouvrage List(s) this item appears in: ASM Egyptologie - Nouveautés 2019 | MSHM - Monde grec 2023 | MSHM - Fonds Pierre Briant
Holdings
Current library Collection Call number Status Notes Date due Barcode
Montpellier : ASM - Archéologie des Sociétés Méditerranéennes Libre accès Papier W CONG 2013 Var (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Exclu du prêt 1100000007778
Nanterre : MSH Mondes - Bibliothèque d’archéologie et des sciences de l’Antiquité E.010/600 NAWO (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available Fonds P. Briant BMRG33987

Bibliogr. p. [363]-405. notes bibliogr. Index p. [409]-447

Even if Alexander’s rule in Asia has to be approached primarily through the study of Greek and Latin authors, many papers in this volume try to look beyond Arrian, Plutarch, Curtius, and Diodorus to Greek inscriptions, papyri, Egyptian, Babylonian, medieval Syriac and Arabic evidence. One focus is on Egypt, from the XXX dynasty to the Ptolemaic age. A lasting achievement of the early Macedonian age in Egypt is the lighthouse of Pharos, probably devised under Alexander to serve both as a watchtower of Alexandria and the focal point of the fire telegraph. Another focus of the volume is on Babylonia, with caveats against the over-enthusiastic usage of cuneiform sources for Alexander. This focus then moves further east, showing how much caution is necessary in studying the topography of Alexander’s campaigns in Baktria, the land often misrepresented by ancient and medieval authors. It also deals with representation and literary topoi, having in mind that Alexander was as much a historical as a literary figure. In many respects ancient Alexander historians handled his persona in strong connection with Herodotean topics, while the idealized portrait of Alexander translated, through court poetry, into the language of power of Ptolemy of Egypt. Alexander was adopted to cultural traditions of the East, both through the medium of the Alexander Romance and through his fictitious correspondence with Aristotle, sometimes becoming a figure of a (Muslim) mystic or a chosen (Jewish) king.
(Source : éditeur)

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.