site du réseau Frantiq
Image from Google Jackets
Normal view MARC view
Transitions during the early Bronze Age in the Levant : methodological problems and interpretative perspectives / edited by Matthew J. Adams and Valentine Roux
Ouvrage
Appartient aux collections: Ägypten und Altes Testament, Görg, Manfred, Wiesbaden, 2011-...., 109, 0720-9061 Notices liées : 3
Publication: Münster : Zaphon, 2022 Description: 1 vol. (VI-318 p.) : ill. en noir, cartes, plans, graph., tabl. ; 31 cmCollection : Ägypten und Altes Testament; 109, ISSN 0720-9061Titre de forme: Congrès, Jérusalem, 2018ISBN: 9783963271588.Langue: Anglais ; de résumé, AnglaisPays: Allemagne Auteur principal: Adams, Matthew Joel, Editeur scientifique Co-auteur: Roux, Valentine, Editeur scientifique, 1956-.... Résumé: The present volume brings together 14 papers. The objective of the workshop was to confront scholarly interpretations of the various transitional phases across the late 4th–3rd Millennium (Late Chalcolithic to Early Bronze I, EB I to EB II, and EB III to EB IV / Intermediate Bronze Age) in the southern Levant. The focus was on the nature of the cultural-period-defining traits and their value for distinguishing between changes related to endogenous or exogenous evolution, cultural or demic diffusion. These traits include material culture, architecture, mortuary practices as well as patterns of relationships between sites and subsistence strategies. – The traditional approach to structuring the past is based on a rigid chronological perception of time forced upon dynamic and fluidly transforming societies. The one-dimensional nature of the chronological approach results in periods of well-defined spatiotemporal cultural entities separated by “transitional” periods. These defined cultural entities are often treated as static, though we know they were not, so that we may interpret cultural, historical, sociological, and political aspects of the society. Transition periods, however, are often treated as outliers interpreted against one or both of the periods that bracket them. (Source : éditeur). Item type: Ouvrage
Holdings
Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Nanterre : MSH Mondes - Bibliothèque d’archéologie et des sciences de l’Antiquité D.330/700 ADAM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available BMRG33246

Ouvrage issu d'un colloque tenu du 16 au 18 mai 2018 au W.F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research et au Centre de recherche français à Jérusalem.

Bibliogr. en fin de contributions. Notes bibliogr.

The present volume brings together 14 papers. The objective of the workshop was to confront scholarly interpretations of the various transitional phases across the late 4th–3rd Millennium (Late Chalcolithic to Early Bronze I, EB I to EB II, and EB III to EB IV / Intermediate Bronze Age) in the southern Levant. The focus was on the nature of the cultural-period-defining traits and their value for distinguishing between changes related to endogenous or exogenous evolution, cultural or demic diffusion. These traits include material culture, architecture, mortuary practices as well as patterns of relationships between sites and subsistence strategies. – The traditional approach to structuring the past is based on a rigid chronological perception of time forced upon dynamic and fluidly transforming societies. The one-dimensional nature of the chronological approach results in periods of well-defined spatiotemporal cultural entities separated by “transitional” periods.
These defined cultural entities are often treated as static, though we know they were not, so that we may interpret cultural, historical, sociological, and political aspects of the society. Transition periods, however, are often treated as outliers interpreted against one or both of the periods that bracket them.
(Source : éditeur)

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.